Y Combinator says Apple’s App Store has hindered startup growth

y combinator has Amicus summary feet In the ongoing legal battle between Apple and Epic Games, on the pretext that the application store strangled the startup innovation.

We have contacted YC and Apple legal representatives to comment.

The summary comes during a legal dispute for a period of years. Epic Games first filed a claim against a monopoly against the iPhone maker in 2020 to protest Apple, where Apple got 30 % fees for each purchase that was performed in the application store, as well as in the game. Epic claimed that Apple illegally prevented developers from informing customers about the payment alternatives to the application store.

The judge ordered Apple to end the anti -deterioration policy, but instead, the company has applied a link that allowed developers to link alternative payment methods, With the application store takes 27 % fees.

In another complaint, Epic Apple was accused of violating a judicial order against the fight against deterioration, and in April, the judge agreed, This led to Apple to stop imposing restrictions On alternative payment solutions and payment of these methods.

Apple appeals this ruling, and for this reason y combinator, Supporter of epic gamesThis is the amicus summary to support epic games. Y Combinator is asking the court to refuse to appeal Apple.

“Y Combinator-and the largest investment capital community-have long been hesitant to support the application-based companies that were poor investments due to the Apple tax,” wrote Y Combinator in his file. “The 30 % revenue share can be the difference between the company that can afford the costs of expanding new employees, and re -investing in its products, which are always struggling to stay standing on its feet.”

With the current ruling – Apple must allow developers to provide alternative payment options with transparency – the emerging investor books: “For the first time in nearly two decades, Y Combinator can seriously think about investing in innovative business that was impossible in the past because of the” apple tax “, the deposit continued. Apple tax indicates the fees obtained by Apple of the App Store purchases.

He went on to say that the Apple tax was “a deep obstacle and often uninterrupted in front of entry that suffocates competition and innovation in its source” and that the court must deny Apple’s appeal and allow the task control base to stand. The next argument was appointed on October 21.